And how they set a dangerous precedent ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

The Trump administration has justified its attack on Iran as necessary to “neutralise” the threats posed by the nuclear regime. The United States calls it “collective self-defence” with its ally, Israel.

Does this stack up under international law? Donald Rothwell argues no – Iran’s nuclear program did not pose an imminent threat to the US or Israel. He points to Trump’s own language to make the case the US strikes were a breach of international law.

Rothwell says condemning these strikes matters – and the Australian government has an obligation to show stronger support for international law.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has instead given the US his support, though as Michelle Grattan notes, it’s “through gritted teeth”.

In 2003, she writes, Albanese was a forceful opponent of the US-led invasion of Iraq. “Iraq does not represent a threat to Australia,” he argued then.

So how is he really viewing the US action in Iran, and could it create even more distance between his government and Trump’s?

P.S. We are in the final stretch of our donations campaign, and we’ve been heartened by your support and feedback. With six days to go until the end of the financial year, there is still time to give

Justin Bergman

International Affairs Editor

 

Why the US strikes on Iran are illegal and can set a troubling precedent

Donald Rothwell, Australian National University

The US and Israel have adopted the most wide-ranging and robust interpretations of the right of self defence. Other nations may now follow their lead.

View from the Hill: Albanese supports US bombing, reluctantly

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

24 hours later the government has backed the US attack on Iran but clearly it remains uncomfortable doing so, but not as uncomfortable in years gone by.

Trump’s decision to bomb Iran exposes fissures in US politics

Lester Munson, University of Sydney

While there is widespread agreement on Iran within US politics, the incendiary nature of agreeing with your adversary makes it seem more fractured than it is.

Australian CEOs are still getting their bonuses. Performance doesn’t seem to matter so much

Richard Denniss, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University

Maybe the leaders of ASX companies could just work hard without the promise of a big bonus.

‘It feels like I am being forced to harm a child’: research shows how teachers are suffering moral injury

Glenys Oberg, The University of Queensland

In a study of 57 Australian teachers, many shared emotionally-charged accounts of being put in impossible situations at work.

Archetyp was one of the dark web’s biggest drug markets. A global sting has shut it down

Elena Morgenthaler, Griffith University; Andrew Childs, Griffith University

Shutdowns like this have become a recurring feature of the dark web. They are usually not a significant turning point.

Is AI a con? A new book punctures the hype and proposes some ways to resist

Luke Munn, The University of Queensland

AI slop means faster and cheaper content, and the technical and financial logic of online platforms creates a race to the bottom.

How do sleep trackers work, and are they worth it? A sleep scientist breaks it down

Dean J. Miller, CQUniversity Australia

Your smartwatch or ring promises to tell you how well you slept. But how?

It’s time to face an uncomfortable truth: maybe our pampered pets would be better off without us

Nancy Cushing, University of Newcastle

The story of Valerie, the dachshund recaptured after almost 18 months living on Kangaroo Island raises serious questions about what life is best for our pets.

Inaccurate and misogynistic: why we need to make the term ‘hysterectomy’ history

Theresa Larkin, University of Wollongong

An operation to remove the uterus should be called a uterectomy – like the removal of the tonsils is a tonsillectomy, or an appendix removal is an appendectomy.

Health + Medicine

Business + Economy

Environment + Energy

Science + Technology

Arts + Culture

Books + Ideas

Your Say

We’ve been wondering too, Michelle
"I would love to see an explainer about how legal the US’ attack on Iran is, from an international law standpoint. There were no weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq and that US administration had rather more credibility than the current one. I’m disquieted by the way the western media is seemingly replaying errors from very recent history."
Michelle Spencer
Ed: Don Rothwell has written on this very topic.

No change
"I have experienced the hollow sounds of a men’s behaviour change program with my ex-husband. The resounding lack of echo means this is a dead duck. Shame about the lack of public involvement, the lack of discussion, the 'behind closed doors' attitude that goes hand in hand with these programs."
Name withheld

Losing my religion
"I was keen to find out more about a lost major artist when I began reading about Eric Smith. But when I saw his religious paintings, finishing the article became a chore. Religious pictures belong to a time when faith was widespread and claimed to be universal, without that context religious images feel like cliches. Smith's disappearance seems more like an artist who lost touch with the world he lived in, than anything mysterious."
Kym Houghton

We'd love to hear from you. You can email us with your thoughts on our stories and each day we'll publish an edited selection.

 

Featured jobs

View all