A look into The Atlantic’s September cover story, reported from Sudan
 
Subscribe to The Atlantic for less than $2 a week.

Support intrepid on-the-ground reporting, and the journalists who pursue it. Subscribe to The Atlantic for less than $2.50 a week.

Anne Applebaum

Staff writer

The magazine cover of the July issue of The Atlantic

Dear Reader, 

 

To write my cover story for this month’s issue of The Atlantic, I made two trips to Sudan. I first crossed from Chad into Darfur, the Sudanese province now controlled by a militia group, the Rapid Support Forces. The second time I flew via Dubai to the coastal city of Port Sudan. Lynsey Addario, a photographer, and I drove from there across the desert to Khartoum, which is controlled by the Sudanese army.  

The magazine cover of the July issue of The Atlantic

Anne Applebaum

Staff writer

Dear Reader, 

 

To write my cover story for this month’s issue of The Atlantic, I made two trips to Sudan. I first crossed from Chad into Darfur, the Sudanese province now controlled by a militia group, the Rapid Support Forces. The second time I flew via Dubai to the coastal city of Port Sudan. Lynsey Addario, a photographer, and I drove from there across the desert to Khartoum, which is controlled by the Sudanese army.  

 

On both trips I saw the aftermath of violence. Sudan is now in its third year of a civil war that seems to have no point, no purpose, and no end. Like a tsunami or a hurricane, the war has left wide swathes of physical wreckage in its wake, and human damage too. Food is scarce. The education system has collapsed. Millions of people have been displaced, inside the country and across the region. 

 

But none of this is happening in a vacuum. Over the past decade, I’ve traveled in America, Europe, Russia, and Ukraine, describing and analyzing the breakdown of international norms, the scrapping of treaties, the weakening of the UN, the hollowing out of the institutions that used to promote peace and human rights. Sudan represents the endgame of this process. When you take away the liberal world order, as it turns out, you don’t get something better. Instead, you get anarchy, nihilism, a war fueled by outsiders—Saudi, Emirati, Turkish, Egyptian, Russian, Iranian—and a scramble for Sudanese gold.

 

The best hope for Sudan is the Sudanese themselves. In the last part of the article, I write about the civilian volunteers who have spent the past three years helping people survive, building a movement known as the Emergency Response Rooms. The volunteers talk about democracy and human rights, not because they have been influenced by outsiders but because they have seen what the world looks like without these things. Also, one of them told me, in the midst of destruction, the only possible response is to build. 


I learned a lot while reporting and writing this article, and I hope readers do too. I found that the effort it took to understand Sudan also helps me understand some of the processes unfolding in the United States and Europe, and I hope readers see that themselves. After all, this is the kind of project that can be carried out only by an organization like The Atlantic, supported by dedicated subscribers. To help make more journalism like this possible, I urge you to subscribe to The Atlantic today.

 

Anne Applebaum
Staff Writer

Subscribe to Read

Read the cover story:

Soldiers with the Sudanese Armed Forces return from the front line in Khartoum.

Soldiers with the Sudanese Armed Forces return from the front line in Khartoum. (Photograph by Lynsey Addario for The Atlantic)

The Most Nihilistic Conflict on Earth

By Anne Applebaum

Sudan’s devastating civil war shows what will replace the liberal order: anarchy and greed.

Read the full story

 

The Atlantic is published monthly.


Download the Atlantic app for Android and iOS


Responses to this email are not monitored. For customer-service inquiries or assistance with your account, please visit our Help Center.


The Atlantic ∙ 610 Water St. SW ∙ Washington, DC 20024

 

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy