How litigation research teams assess disputes work

Across Europe, firms are increasingly focused on how their disputes work is evaluated — not just in submissions, but throughout the research process.

As litigation and regulatory enforcement continue to evolve, understanding how research teams interpret case outcomes, client feedback and interview insight has become an important part of achieving strong rankings results.

With this in mind, our colleagues at Benchmark Litigation Europe are hosting an upcoming research webinar offering a behind-the-scenes look at how litigation research is conducted and how firms are assessed in practice.

The session will explore:

How research teams evaluate disputes work beyond written submissions
The role of interviews, client and referee feedback in final rankings decisions
Common issues that weaken otherwise strong submissions
How firms can better support their case during the research process

This discussion will be relevant to firms involved in complex litigation, regulatory disputes and enforcement matters across Europe.

A recording will be available for all registrants who are unable to attend live.

ITR regularly covers the litigation implications of tax, enforcement and cross-border disputes — this session provides additional insight into how litigation research teams contextualise disputes work.

1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Registered in England & Wales, Company number 15238942
If you no longer wish to receive communications from ITR, please unsubscribe here.

Privacy Policy | Manage Preferences