+ Experts point to standing—and why it’s tricky.
 

The Daily Docket

The Daily Docket

A newsletter by Reuters and Westlaw

By Caitlin Tremblay

Good morning. Challenging President Trump’s $1.776 billion IRS settlement in court may be tough. Plus, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue opinions this morning; medical groups will challenge the FTC's gender-affirming care probe; unions will ask a federal judge to block a labor board's bid to concentrate legal powers in D.C.; and Trump’s attorney at Sullivan & Cromwell pledged to recuse himself from cases if confirmed to the 2nd Circuit. Turns out NASA’s Perseverance Rover was aptly named. It’s about to complete marathon mileage on Mars, with 10 years of power left. Let’s carry that same energy into Thursday.

Trump's $1.776 billion 'weaponization' fund sparks outrage, but court challenges may be tough

 

REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Opponents face significant legal and political hurdles in challenging President Trump’s $1.776 billion IRS settlement, though experts say cracks could appear over time. Here’s what to know:

Big picture: Challenging the deal will be difficult for now. Trump ended his lawsuit before a judge reviewed it, leaving critics with limited legal options.

Why it’s hard to challenge: Experts say most opponents lack legal standing, but that could change later if people dispute payouts or a future administration revisits Trump’s audit protections.

Who can file a claim: The fund would compensate people alleging government “weaponization,” and officials say January 6 defendants could be eligible, prompting lawsuits from two Capitol police officers who say the fund could embolden those who threatened them. Read that complaint here. 

What could change: While many critics lack standing now, individuals denied compensation could gain it later. Some lawyers say even a rejected claim by someone like Hunter Biden could open the door to broader challenges.

Congress’ role: Congress may ultimately decide the issue. Democrats argue the fund violates the Constitution’s Appropriations Clause, and some Republicans have expressed concern. But with Republicans in control, near-term action is unlikely, though that could change after future elections.

Tom Hals and Jonathan Stempel have more here.

 

Coming up today

  • SCOTUS: The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue rulings in pending, argued cases.
  • Constitutional: The 9th Circuit will hear an appeal from the Arizona Board of Regents that argues it should not have to face a lawsuit filed by students who were arrested during an pro-Palestinian protest on campus. The board claims it has immunity under the Eleventh Amendment but the lower court ruled that it did not, citing Arizona Supreme Court precedent. 
  • LGBTQ+: The American Academy of Pediatrics will urge U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper in D.C. to block the FTC from forcing it to turn over documents as part of an investigation into the medical group concerning its support of gender-affirming care for transgender youth. Read the complaint.
  • Government: U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols in D.C. will hold a motion hearing in a lawsuit that seeks to halt President Trump’s ongoing renovation to the Lincoln Memorial's reflecting pool. 
  • Immigration: Chief U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr in Rhode Island will hear arguments in a lawsuit by a coalition of immigrant service organizations and labor unions challenging new policies by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services that they say have effectively shut down large portions of the legal immigration system, including a halt on asylum adjudications. Read the complaint.
  • Labor: A group of unions will urge Chief U.S. District Judge Denise Casper in Boston to block the Federal Labor Relations Authority from stripping career staffers of the power to order elections and giving it to a panel appointed by the president. Read the complaint.
  • IP: Google and Sonos will both ask U.S. Magistrate Judge Peter Kang in San Francisco to modify a $32.5 million jury verdict that Sonos won against Google in a long-running patent dispute over multi-room audio technology. Google will ask the court to negate or reduce the damages award, while Sonos will ask to increase it and add a permanent injunction blocking sales of Google's infringing speakers, which Google says it has since redesigned. The Federal Circuit reinstated the verdict last year after U.S. District Judge William Alsup overturned it in 2023.

Court calendars are subject to last-minute docket changes.

 

More top news

  • Trump to sign order on AI oversight as security fears mount among supporters
  • Former Cuban President Raul Castro charged with murder in U.S.
  • Elon Musk's X loses Australia child protection compliance lawsuit
  • Democrats push to rein in Trump on Cuba as White House steps up pressure
  • Health Secretary Kennedy fires heads of key preventive health panel
 
 

Industry insight

  • Matthew Schwartz, a Sullivan & Cromwell lawyer nominated by President Trump for a seat on the 2nd Circuit, said he would recuse himself from Trump-related cases and rule impartially, but could not say how much Trump owes his firm for representing him in two appeals, including one tied to his 2024 conviction. Read more about the hearing here.
  • A former DOJ attorney has been charged with emailing herself copies of an unreleased volume of Special Counsel Jack Smith's report concerning the now-dismissed criminal case accusing President Trump of retaining classified documents after his first term.
 

In the courts

  • Civil rights: The 1st